Lagoon symposium: Should county commissions take the lead in preservation efforts?

At the second annual Indian River Lagoon Symposium sponsored by Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, participants discussed ways of taking more effective action to preserve one of North America's most ecologically diverse estuaries.  Reducing storm water runoff, and possibly reversing the flow of draining canals such as the one above were among the suggestions discussed at the symposium.
At the second annual Indian River Lagoon Symposium sponsored by Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, participants discussed ways of taking more effective action to preserve one of North America’s most ecologically diverse estuaries. Reducing storm water runoff, and possibly reversing the flow of drainage canals such as the one pictured above were among the suggestions discussed at the symposium.

BY MARK SCHUMANN

FORT PIERCE – The second annual Indian River Lagoon Symposium, sponsored by Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, drew a crowd of 250 participants Thursday and Friday, including scientists, elected officials, environmentalists, educators and citizen activists concerned about protecting the health of the lagoon.

Everyone agrees the Indian River Lagoon is suffering from polluted storm water runoff, which is affecting plants, birds and fish that depend on the lagoon’s diverse, yet fragile ecosystem.  Just how sick the lagoon is becoming, and what practical steps can be implemented to reverse declines in plant and wildlife populations were the topics addressed by representatives of the Saint John’s Water Management District, the National Estuary Program, the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program, scientists and citizen activists.

John Orcutt, a resident of Vero Beach, who formerly worked as a scientist with Harbor Branch, said it is time to embrace a new paradigm for organizing government efforts, and for building political will for protecting the lagoon.  “Only government has the tools to deal with remediating pollution,” he said.

While arguing that the lagoon cannot be saved without effective government action, Orcutt also outlined obstacles local, state and federal agencies mush overcome, including reduced funding, the tendency of agencies to retain personnel who have proved to be ineffective, an adherence to an outdated organizational model for the responsibilities assumed by different government agencies, obstacles to the adoption and enforcement of effective fertilizer restrictions, a paralysis of analysis that leads to more study and less action, and a lack of focus on measuring results.

In illustrating his point, Orcutt explained that just as the Environmental Protection Agency is planning to turn over more of its responsibilities to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, DEP is laying off some if its most seasoned and employees.

Orcutt argued that it is time to consider a paradigm shift that places more emphasis on what individual county commissions can accomplish, with local public support, and with assistance from the state and federal government.

Orcutt said the kind of measures needed to save the lagoon simply will not happen without the commitment and involvement of the five county commissions from Volusia County south to Martin County.

Robert Virnstein, a sea grass ecosystem analyst, told the group that thought there will never be enough research data available to know with certainty what is killing off vital sea grass beds and reducing the populations of fish, decisions must be made now to preserve one of North America’s most diverse estuaries.

Kathy Hill, with the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program, addressed efforts to educate the general public.  More specifically, Hill explored ways of more effectively engage stakeholders in the health of the lagoon to support and participate in preservation efforts.

During the open discussion that followed the presentations by Virnstein, Hill and Orcutt, one member of the public, emphasizing the importance of getting the message to people who don’t realize how quickly the lagoon is declining said, “We need an Indian crying.”

2 comments

  1. Yes, the elected “leaders” of the County Commission and the COVB should be fully supportive of any and all efforts to protect our ecological treaures. This is one of the reasons that their failure to vote in support of being a part of the Seven50.org coaliition made no sense. Since pollution does not honor county borders, logica dictates that Indian River County must work with organizations in other countries to preserve our water and land for the next generations.

    John Orcutt is correct in stating that “only government has the tools to deal with remeditating pollution. This is a lesson that I personally learned in the 1960’s on the staff of the Senate Committee on Public Works which passed the first Clean Air and Clean Water laws in the nation.

  2. A fine group of very interested, passionate and community minded individuals attended the Indian River Lagoon Forum.

    It has been suggested the county commissions take the lead I would counter by pointing out the cities in Indian River County have much lagoon property to protect and preserve. Sebastian, Orchid, Indian River shores, Vero Beach and Fellsmere have direct connections to the lagoon. Unless the county is a charter government it would have a difficult time enforcing any regulations on the cities. What should happen is a cooperation of the cities taking the lead working with the counties. Interlocal agreements would need to be formulated to address each specific area and concern. It was strongly emphasized that the lagoon is extremely diverse and each area has to be addressed according to that evidence of diversity.

    There are a few points I noticed while attending and observing the forum. These relate more to the challenge educators and scientists have in reaching the public and the policy makers.

    *There are multiple agencies working toward the common goal of a healthy, vibrant lagoon.

    *There are some policy makers waiting for scientists to tell them what’s wrong and what to do.

    *There are other policy makers willing now to act on what knowledge they have.

    *The information researched and compiled for public awareness is massive and detailed.

    *Creating common sense easy reading material for the public has been a challenge.

    *Keeping the interest of the public and elected officials has been a challenge.

    *Deciding Education-Participation vs. Regulation or a common-sense combination of.

    *Four groups were identified as needing to collaborate to achieve a healthy lagoon goal:
    1) Scientists
    2) Educators
    3) Government Officials and Policy Makers
    4) Engaged Citizens including recreational, industry, tourism and personal use/enjoyment

    *There is a need for a singular data room available to the these groups to share
    information.

    *The purpose of the group sharing would be to:
    1) Investigate-Research-Compile Data
    2) Educate-Communicate-Fund Raise
    3) Disperse Information – Draft Policy & Ordinance if necessary
    4) Share experience, knowledge and effectiveness

    The goal being to identify causes and initiate prevention to eliminate need for rehabilitation.

Comment - Please use your first and last name. Comments of up to 350 words are welcome.