Is a marina resort in Vero Beach’s future?

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following article was first published in 2013.  As the City moves forward with the sale of Vero Electric, at least some of the Council’s attention will likely turn how to best make use of the riverfront property now occupied by the decommissioned power plant. Any discussion about development of the power plant site will almost surely include consideration of if and how to incorporate the existing waste water treatment plant site in any significant development. Now, Councilman Val Zudans is calling for referendums that would remove provisions in the City Charter that prevent the sale or lease of the power plant site and the waste water treatment site without voter approval. Anyone who thought the push to sell Vero Electric was not ultimately about making centralyl located public riverfront lands available for commercial development was missing the larger point.


Built at the northwest base of the bridge at Blue Heron Boulevard in Riviera Beach, sits the Loggerhead Marina and Resort. Is a marina and resort in Vero Beach's future?
Built at the northwest base of the bridge at Blue Heron Boulevard in Riviera Beach, sits the Loggerhead Marina and Resort. Is a marina and resort in Vero Beach’s future?

BY MARK SCHUMANN Councilwoman Pilar Turner has pledged to “liberate” the power plant and wastewater treatment plant sites, presumably for some higher and better use. Turner recently reiterated her aversion to government investment in real estate, which begs the question of from whom and for what purpose she intends to “liberate” the waterfront. Within the city limits, the only remaining undeveloped riverfront land is publically owned.  If there is to be further development on the city’s waterfront, say at the western base of the Alma Lee Loy Bridge, the land will first have to be “liberated” from the public – either by sale or long-term lease. Some who are counting on a provision in the City Charter to preserve the city’s remaining riverfront lands for public use doubt voters would ever approve of selling or leasing the land for private, commercial development. But consider these facts.

  1. Mayor Craig Fletcher has said that he would prefer to see the power plant site developed in some way other than a park, “perhaps a marina.”  Fletcher interest, he said, is to see the land used in some way that will “generate revenue for the city.”
  2. Councilwoman Pilar Turner last week reiterated her aversion to the city investing in real estate.  To receive her support, any development of the power plant site will presumably have to be privately funded.
  3. Fletcher, Turner and Councilwoman Tracy Carroll have all made statements suggesting they have given more than a little thought to the power plant site being developed as a marina.
  4. No less than $8 million of the value of Florida Power & Light’s offer for Vero Electric is going to pay to locate a new electrical substation off the current site.  Though the Council never voted to establish a policy that all 17 acres of the power plant site must be cleared, City Manager Jim O’Connor insists those were his marching orders. It woud seem someone has a vision a 17-acres something, and its clearly not a riverfront park.

Currently, Vero Beach has in place building height restrictions and Charter provisions protecting the power plant and wastewater treatment plant sites for public use.  But all of that could change, especially if voters are faced with limited choices. Given the Council’s unwillingness to hear so much as one word about raising Vero Beach’s tax rate, the public is going to have to accept cuts in services.   The only other option for closing the budget gap that will result from the sale of the electric system will be for voters to approve aggressive proposals for increasing the city’s tax base – such as easing height restrictions and developing publicly owned riverfront property. Don’t be surprised if in the next few years the discussion shifts from divesting the city of its electric utility and water and sewer system to one of easing height restrictions in order to more effectively “liberate” the waterfront for commercial development.

The Loggerhead Marina in Riviera Beach
The Loggerhead Marina in Riviera Beach

When asked about the potential for a marina resort at the northwest base of the Alma Lee Loy Bridge, City Manager Jim O’Connor dismissed the ideas, arguing that no one would build such a project close to a heavily traveled bridge.  Really?  Just 60 miles to the south of Vero Beach sits the Loggerhead Marina and Resort, built at the northwest base of the bridge at Blue Heron Boulevard. Some suggest serious discussions about how to develop the power plant site are five to ten years away.  That is probably correct, for the sale of Vero Electric likely won’t take place until late 2016,.  At that point, FPL will have another three to four years to decommission the plant and turn the land back to the city. But does that mean private discussions are not already taking place?  Hardly. Now is the time for city voters to tell the Council they never want to be put in the position of having to choose between easing building height restrictions or giving up the quality of municipal services that have helped to make Vero Beach one of the Florida’s most beautiful coastal communities.


  1. Changing the building height restrictions to accommodate a privately-owned tourist attraction on power plant land, opens up the rest of the City of Vero Beach to taller buildings. Doesn’t it? This takes away a unique quality of life not noted in areas further south of us. I doubt anyone in our community would be thrilled to see skyscrapers popping up here. Land developers and other construction folks would jump on it, of course.

  2. Lets not get carried away with speculation. Regardless of whether the property is developed or not, there is still a height restrictioin which is not likely to change. The smart thing to do is to try and remove the stipulation regarding the plant from the OUC and shutting it down ourselves. Take the plant out of the equation the next time we try to sell the system, this deal is dead. A marina is one thing, a resort and marina, quite another.
    Putting a “loggerhead” style development is not likely to happen. A full service marina, open to the public, would be “awesome”, in my opinion.
    But thats is just that, my opinion. Evryone has one.

  3. “Let’s not get carried away with speculation,” sounds like something Prime Minister Neville Chamberlin might have said to Winston Churchill, when he tried to call attention to the growing threat of German rearmament.

    What makes you so sure that a Charter amendment to release the land for private development will not also include a provision easing building height restrictions?

  4. Another weekly publication has identified that there is already a coalition formed to develop property that will be “liberated” by the sale of the COVB utilies to FP&L and the merger of water and sewer operations to the county. The projected date for this “business opportunity” is set for 2024 so it should give everyone pause to wonder why Messers. Huryn, Justice and Schlitt are now operating in partnership a decade in advance of any available land. Also, the question should also be raised as to whether or not they are operating under the premise that the COVB “leadership” has given them the green light and assurance that they will not have any competition for the project development. Hard questions should be asked about this new business coalition at the July 23rd public meeting.

Comment - Please use your first and last name. Comments of up to 350 words are welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s