Why would anyone object to InsideVero?

BY MILT THOMAS

I attended the last Downtown Friday and received many comments about this publication. What I found interesting is that people were either for or against us. Even more interesting, the people who were supportive cited specific issues on which we reported or commented.  However, those who were opposed, had nothing specific in their objections other than slanderous personal attacks.

That seems to be the way to approach issues today. You are either for our position or you are the enemy. What happened to the First Amendment, you know, the cornerstone of democracy? (By the way, the Second Amendment is not the cornerstone of democracy although some would have you believe it is.)

What differentiates the United States from dictatorships is our ability to debate issues rather than have a one-size-fits-all form of government. Debate and opposing priorities are healthy for a democracy, with the result usually being something we can all live with. But bullying and demeaning people who don’t agree with you is only healthy for a dictatorship.  The enemy here is not an opposing view, it is lack of respect for any view not your own.

Our great country emerged from a debate over whether we should be royal subjects or control our own destiny. Believe it or not, colonists were not all in favor of revolution and many were quite content being part of the British Empire. Even after the American Revolution, there was debate over whether George Washington should be president or king.

Today’s debates seem mired in special interests, with one side calling the other un-American. Having the debate itself is uniquely American, and everyone participating in that debate is protected by our Constitution. Senator McCarthy tried to label everyone who didn’t agree with him as a communist and when we realized he was the most un-American of all, his world came crashing down around him. It’s interesting that we have again started calling an opposing point of view as communist even though communism is all but extinct.

If you ever participated in a high school or college debate, the winner was not rewarded with a right to beat up the loser. Recently, a formal debate by foreign policy experts was held at Riverside Theatre over the question of Israel and Iran. It was an excellent example of opposing views being treated with respect because the people who engaged in that debate were Americans who understood that foreign policy is not monolithic and it is executed through negotiation, even within a political party.

Which brings us back to InsideVero. We offer news and commentary on issues important to all residents of Vero Beach and Indian River County. We know the difference between news and opinion. In depth reporting on issues like the Vero Electric sale and Indian River Lagoon is not opinion just because some people feel their view on an issue is the only one regardless of inconvenient facts.

As far as opinion is concerned, we invite anyone to contribute, even if they don’t agree with our opinion on an issue. Our only requirement is that your letters to the editor not show disrespect for those who do not necessarily agree with you.

6 comments

  1. Asking questions, looking for answers that contain more than statistical information (which I’m convinced have a way of being easily manipulated), and keeping abreast of what’s happening in our part of the world is important. I can’t provide a solution to the Middle East turmoil. I have no clue what to do about global warming, and I can’t even figure out why my favorite teams aren’t on top any more. Inside Vero focuses on local people, events, and situations. It is my responsibility to make an honest attempt at sorting through the puzzle pieces of a story. Having made mistakes along the way, I’m aware I may not hit the bullseye or even a part of a target. It’s more about hearing many voices with many points of view. Inside Vero offers that opportunity in a timely fashion. In my opinion.

  2. I am sorry to hear about the negative comments you heard at Downtown Friday, Milt, but certainly not suprised. InsideVero is a glimmer of hope that well researched news, reasoned opinion and welcomed dialogue is part of our community.
    Please keep up the good work.

  3. Though I appreciate the journalism, I must reply on a couple of issues with this edition. First, Communism is alive and well in Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, China, So. Africa and parts of Latin America. Second, America was referred to as a Democracy. We are a Republic. In a Republic the sovereignty is in each individual. In a democracy sovereignty is in the group, the majority rules the minority. For decades our politicians are trying to brainwash the new generations into calling this a democracy. The minority in this country are protected in the Bill of Rights. Powers are vested in the people and exercised by the people through their representatives. Third, if we ever lose the Second Amendment you can say good by to the First Amendment. To have a healthy debate, we need to hold media accountable to their lies. The power in the media is quite scary. Lastly, I believe that when George Washington became the fist president, he and his cabinet were careful NOT to refer to him as “King”. John Adams once referred to him as “your highness” and the people were in an uproar- including the president! The people did not want another king. That is the fact.

  4. Tricia Crescenzi is unfortunately wrong in her claim that it is only a “minority” who are protected by the Bill of Rights. All Americans are protected by this document.

    No one is advocating for the removal of the Second Amendment. However, with rights come responsibilities and the various gun saftety proposals that have been initiated are to protect the people from gun owners. All national public opinion polls validate that the majority want more gun control. Also, it is important to remember that the 2nd Amendment only gives you the right to own a musket and form a militia.

    There is nothing in the power of the media that should be scary. There is no one in the media advocating for a return to royalty rule. If and when the media lies, it is not possible to hold them accountable unless you provide speciics and factual information to justify your opinion that the media has lied.

Comment - Please use your first and last name. Comments of up to 350 words are welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s