What do City of Vero Beach voters really think about Three Corners?

COMMENTARY

MILT THOMAS

When it gets right down to it, Three Corners is really Two Corners – the former Vero Electric and current Water Treatment properties. Both are protected in the City Charter for public use, which means anything other than public use would require a City of Vero Beach voter referendum.

Significant effort and expense has been put into developing plans with guidance from Andreas Duany’s DPZ Codesign consultants, including the now famous January 31 “Standing Ovation” conceptual plan.

Then COVID-19 changed everything.

As a result, Duany advised City Council last month that post-pandemic development will differ dramatically and the S.O. plan needed major alterations. Duany and his firm then created a post-pandemic version of the conceptual plan that has since spawned several more versions. Now we have an either-or-or-or-or plan. Clearly, City Council could not make any decisions (or a proposed November 3 voter referendum) until further study of the options and input from voters, which has been non-existent since the first post-pandemic version was presented last month.

The bottom line issue here is what plan is best for Vero Beach and will City of Vero Beach voters agree? Vero Beach voters decided by referendum to protect these two properties from commercial development by placing them in the City Charter. Each of the plans recommended by Duany’s firm feature parks and open space required under the current land use designation. However, they also include commercial development.

There are valid arguments for including commercial development in the plan if that is what the citizens and voters of Vero Beach truly want. Some have recently expressed a desire to keep all the land in public use as originally intended. But does that reflect a majority opinion of Vero Beach voters?

How many City residents and businesses approved the original conceptual plan that received a standing ovation endorsement? One source notes that 16,000 people contributed during the charrette and subsequent SpeakUpVero Beach website. How many of those lived within the City of Vero Beach?

When all is said and done and a final plan is approved by City Council, it must then go to City voters in a referendum, because they – not present or former City Council members, County officials or the media –  have the most to lose, which is public control of the Two Corners properties.

 

4 comments

  1. I would strongly object to any amenity in which people other than city of Vero Beach residents get to use no charge. That includes boat dockage and launching. There should be some sort of parking fee, annually, monthly weekly, daily or hourly that is charged to any non city of Vero Beach residents use of this area. City of Vero Beach residents should have have sticker on their windshield that allows the free usage of this area.

  2. Agree entirely John Wester. The entire county takes advantage of Vero Beach. Many of COVB parks should be charged appropriately to pay for the maintenance its city property.

  3. Truth is there is really only one corner – the cost of moving the water treatment plant is astronomical, and if anyone thinks “income” from commercial use of the power plant land will cover one one-thousandth of that cost, think again.

Comment - Please use your first and last name. Comments of up to 350 words are welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s