Hillman and Heady back in City Council race, await decision on date for special election



Linda Hillman
Brian Heady

The Vero Beach Canvassing Board has reinstated candidates Linda Hillman and Brian Heady in their quest for seats on the City Council. In a hastily called public meeting (notice went out yesterday), the Canvassing Board members – City Clerk Tammy Bursick, City Attorney Wayne Coment and City Manager Jim O’Connor – decided there were too many questions about actions and events leading up to the disqualifications, so they voted to re-qualify them. According to the Board, this action will  result in postponing the City election until several weeks after the November 6 County and State election because overseas ballots have already been mailed out.

A civil suit filed by candidate Hillman prompted the meeting, which is unusual in that Canvassing Boards typically meet after an election to certify the results. But the suit claimed Hillman’s disqualification was unjustified and handled improperly. “At the close of qualifying, Plaintiff Linda Hillman was identified as a duly qualified candidate… The City Clerk also certified to the Indian River County Supervisor of Elections that Plaintiff Linda Hillman was a duly qualified candidate…so that the name of Plaintiff Linda Hillman would appear on the ballot.”

The meeting began with the Board claiming the candidate is responsible for the correct filing of campaign documents, but enough questions were raised by the candidates and supporters in the room about paperwork, inadvertent mistakes and document security, that O’Connor made a motion to reinstate Hillman and Heady. Bursick seconded the motion and it passed 3-0.

The next step is for City Council to call for a special election. probably in conjunction with the next City Council meeting on October 2.






  1. The Canvasing Board made the right decision. Who and what precipitated this problem? Strange things are going with this city council.

  2. I am struck by the term used “document security”. I would like the public to be told what that term means in the Hillman and Heady reinstatement. The public deserves some honest answers. A full explanation is warranted . Who had access to these legal documents ?

Comment - Please use your first and last name. Comments of up to 350 words are welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s